Large Text Medium Text Small Text

Viewpoint

Attached Document: Thoughts on Ohio's Climb to the Top

Print this article

Thoughts on Ohio's Climb to the Top

The table on the reverse side shows that in the course of a generation, Ohio has climbed to the highest rungs of the tax burden ladder in this country. Once a low tax state, Ohio has raced past forty-one other states and now ranks fifth in state and local taxes measured as a percent of income. No other state in the nation has increased its relative tax burden as greatly over the past thirty-five years.

Does this matter? It does if you accept this economic truth: The more you tax something, the less you have of it. In the case of the Tax Foundation data

presented here, the 'something' that is taxed is quite simply the sum of economic activity occurring in Ohio. The more we tax economic activity, especially in comparison to other states, the less of it we will enjoy here in Ohio.

Less 'economic activity' is a sanitized way of saying our climb up the tax burden ladder has meant fewer jobs, less wages for those lucky enough to have jobs, and less opportunity for our state’s citizens to realize the prosperity their talents and effort could afford them elsewhere. There are consequences of having less of each of these benefits of economic activity. They include more unemployment, more broken families, more criminal activity, more drug use, more flight of brainpower and youthful energies, more bankruptcies and more school dropouts, just to name a few issues at stake in our state and local tax policies.

Some try to turn the truth about the consequences of taxes on its head. They say that taxes and government spending are a necessary ingredient for growing an economy, that the spending decisions of politicians and bureaucrats are an 'investment' that builds the capacity of our economic infrastructure.

By making this claim the tax-and-spenders try to deny a second economic principle. When the citizens of Ohio are able to keep more of the reward of their talents, ambitions and industry, far more good is done for the state's economy than is caused by a similar amount of spending routed through, and paying for, the political classes which run government. This truth should be self evident: just look at what our politicians have to show for their management of our state’s economy after leading us up forty-one steps on the tax burden ladder.

The debate needs to focus on why we are not cutting taxes. Jobs continue to leave the state yet the size and cost of government continues to grow. Ohio can compete for new jobs and higher incomes only if lawmakers follow the positive examples set by Florida, Tennessee, and Texas and eliminate state and local income taxes. Citizens in these states enjoy a higher level of economic prosperity and freedom than do Ohioans. State and local income tax elimination would take Ohio's tax burden down from 12.4 percent to 9.3 percent and tie Texas for the eighth lowest tax burden in the nation. The move would give our state's economy a much needed boost.

Ohio's State and Local Tax Burden Rank as Percent of Income Compared to Other States

1970

1994

2007

1

Vermont

12.3%

1

New York

13.7%

1

Vermont

14.1%

2

New York

12.3%

2

Wisconsin

12.4%

2

Maine

14%

3

South Dakota

12.1%

3

Maine

12.2%

3

New York

13.8%

4

Wisconsin

11.8%

4

Hawaii

12.1%

4

Rhode Island

12.7%

5

North Dakota

11.4%

5

Vermont

12.0%

5

Ohio

12.4%

6

Alaska

11.3%

6

Minnesota

11.9%

6

Hawaii

12.4%

7

Wyoming

11.1%

7

Washington

11.7%

7

Wisconsin

12.3%

8

California

10.9%

8

Iowa

11.5%

8

Connecticut

12.2%

9

Maine

10.8%

9

New Jersey

11.3%

9

Nebraska

11.9%

10

Arizona

10.8%

10

New Mexico

11.2%

10

New Jersey

11.6%

11

Iowa

10.8%

11

Connecticut

11.2%

11

Minnesota

11.5%

12

Hawaii

10.7%

12

Rhode Island

11.1%

12

California

11.5%

13

Washington

10.5%

13

Arizona

11.1%

13

Arkansas

11.3%

14

Minnesota

10.5%

14

Nebraska

11.0%

14

Michigan

11.2%

15

Utah

10.5%

15

Utah

10.9%

15

Kansas

11.2%

16

Montana

10.4%

16

Idaho

10.6%

16

Washington

11.1%

17

Nebraska

10.3%

17

Oregon

10.5%

17

Louisiana

11%

18

Massachusetts

10.3%

18

Kansas

10.5%

18

Iowa

11%

19

Mississippi

10.3%

19

Montana

10.4%

19

North Carolina

11%

20

New Mexico

10.2%

20

Maryland

10.4%

20

Kentucky

10.9%

21

Nevada

10.2%

21

Kentucky

10.4%

21

West Virginia

10.9%

22

Illinois

10.1%

22

Massachusetts

10.4%

22

Illinois

10.8%

23

Michigan

10.0%

23

Michigan

10.3%

23

Maryland

10.8%

24

Kansas

10.0%

24

Ohio

10.3%

24

Pennsylvania

10.8%

25

Colorado

10.0%

25

Georgia

10.2%

25

Indiana

10.7%

26

Maryland

10.0%

26

California

10.2%

26

South Carolina

10.7%

27

Idaho

9.7%

27

Illinois

10.1%

27

Utah

10.7%

28

Oregon

9.7%

28

North Carolina

10.0%

28

Massachusetts

10.6%

29

West Virginia

9.6%

29

Mississippi

10.0%

29

Mississippi

10.5%

30

Indiana

9.5%

30

West Virginia

10.0%

30

Colorado

10.4%

31

Rhode Island

9.5%

31

Florida

9.9%

31

Arizona

10.3%

32

Kentucky

8.9%

32

North Dakota

9.9%

32

Georgia

10.3%

33

New Jersey

8.9%

33

Pennsylvania

9.9%

33

Virginia

10.2%

34

Connecticut

8.9%

34

Colorado

9.9%

34

Missouri

10.1%

35

Virginia

8.9%

35

South Carolina

9.9%

35

Idaho

10.1%

36

Florida

8.8%

36

Indiana

9.9%

36

Nevada

10.1%

37

North Carolina

8.7%

37

Nevada

9.8%

37

Oregon

10%

38

Pennsylvania

8.7%

38

Texas

9.7%

38

Florida

10%

39

Missouri

8.7%

39

Arkansas

9.6%

39

North Dakota

9.9%

40

Tennessee

8.7%

40

Oklahoma

9.6%

40

New Mexico

9.8%

41

Georgia

8.7%

41

Virginia

9.6%

41

Montana

9.7%

42

New Hampshire

8.6%

42

South Dakota

9.6%

42

Wyoming

9.5%

43

South Carolina

8.5%

43

Wyoming

9.5%

43

Texas

9.3%

44

Louisiana

8.4%

44

Missouri

9.5%

44

South Dakota

9%

45

Arkansas

8.3%

45

New Hampshire

9.1%

45

Oklahoma

9%

46

Alabama

8.2%

46

Louisiana

8.7%

46

Alabama

8.8%

47

Ohio

8.1%

47

Alabama

8.6%

47

Delaware

8.8%

48

Oklahoma

8.0%

48

Tennessee

8.3%

48

Tennessee

8.5%

49

Texas

7.9%

49

Delaware

8.2%

49

New Hampshire

8%

50

Delaware

7.7%

50

Alaska

6.9%

50

Alaska

6.6%


Sources: Tax Foundation - http://www.taxfoundation.org/; Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Dept. of Commerce


.







Attached Document: Thoughts on Ohio's Climb to the Top

New to the Buckeye Institute? Sign up for our newsletter!

Please enter your email address here

SIGN IN:

Password: