The Buckeye Institute filed its response brief in McNutt v. U.S. Department of Justice—one of The Buckeye Institute’s two cases challenging the unconstitutional federal prohibition on home distilling—with the U.S. Supreme Court. In its response, The Buckeye Institute urged the Supreme Court to grant review of McNutt and also Ream v. U.S. Department of Treasury. “The importance of the fundamental constitutional questions in these two cases being addressed together can hardly be overstated.”

At RealClearEnergy, The Buckeye Institute offers reforms electric grid operators like PJM need to make to meet growing energy demand. “Data centers, advanced manufacturing, and other drivers of economic growth are increasing demand for electricity across the U.S. Meeting that demand will require new sources of electric power—and quickly. Unfortunately, the grid operators responsible for connecting power supplies to the grid face outdated regulations and often lack the technology or incentives to bring new power online.”

In Crain’s Cleveland Business, The Buckeye Institute urges policymakers to do more to build a strong workforce in Ohio and recommends several public policy changes for improving Ohio’s labor force. “CNBC rightly recognized and rewarded Ohio for being a great place to do business. Addressing labor force concerns by improving employee training with better, outcome-based education funding incentives is long overdue. Making those adjustments will enhance worker pay and efficiency and offer the marketable skills that businesses value.”

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief in Hall v. Fleming, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case and overturn Locke v. Davey, which wrongly interpreted the U.S. Constitution’s establishment clause and endorsed an unprecedented suspicion of religion in public life. “The Buckeye Institute urges the Supreme Court to take this case and tell Virginia it cannot deny publicly available scholarship funds to college students who major in religious subjects.”

At Reason, C. Jarrett Dieterle looks at Ream v. U.S. Department of Treasury—one of The Buckeye Institute’s cases challenging the federal ban on home distilling. Dieterle writes, “John Ream is trying to do something that should be straightforward: distill his own alcohol. Since the Founding of our country, Americans have sought to distill spirits on their own property for personal consumption… For over a century and a half, however, home distilling has been illegal. The Supreme Court could soon step in.”

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief in Jouppi v. Alaska, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to tell Alaska that seizing a plane over a six-pack of beer is the embodiment of an excessive fine that the U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment prohibits. “For 14 years, the state of Alaska has been trying to seize Mr. Jouppi’s plane over a six-pack of beer. A $95,000 plane, forfeited for a six-pack of Budweiser, exemplifies the type of financial incentives that are corrupting our criminal justice system.” 

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief in Grand v. University Heights, Ohio, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the property rights and religious liberty rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. “From the Pilgrims secret meetings in Scrooby Manor, to John Locke’s theories of linking property and religious liberty, to James Madison’s belief that the free exercise of one’s religion is itself a property right, property and freedom of conscience have flowed together throughout American history and must be protected from government tyranny.”

The Buckeye Institute joined Washington Legal Foundation and the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center in filing a second amicus brief in Ohio Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit agreed to rehear the case en banc (by the full court), calling on the court to affirm congressional authority over federal rulemaking. 

Robert Alt, president and chief executive officer of The Buckeye Institute, received the prestigious 2026 Thomas A. Roe Award for Excellence in Leadership. Established in 1992 and named after the late businessman and generous philanthropist, State Policy Network’s Thomas A. Roe Award pays tribute to those who have advanced public policy solutions grounded in free-market principles—particularly in the state policy movement—and recognizes leadership, innovation, and accomplishment.

The Buckeye Institute filed its amicus brief in Viramontes v. Cook Co. and Grant v. Higgins, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to tell Cook County and other jurisdictions that arbitrary firearm bans violate the U.S. Constitution. “Contrary to popular belief, detachable magazines are nothing new. The public’s visceral reaction against them does not give Cook County, or other jurisdictions, a license to violate the constitutional rights of Americans.”