Large Text Medium Text Small Text

BuckeyeBlog

Posts Tagged ‘privatization’

Another Free Market “miracle”

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

The Enquirer reported on Drake Hospital’s recent turnaround over two weeks ago, but it is a story worth revisiting for further thought:

Three years ago, the long-term rehabilitation hospital was losing more than $10 million a year, slightly less than Hamilton County taxpayers were pumping into it annually to keep the facility afloat. Its costs were 70 percent higher than those of other hospitals. Its chief executive officer was making more than $400,000. Meanwhile, the center was operating at 45 percent of capacity and its supporters lived in fear it would close.

Drake’s only hope was to take a dose of strong medicine. In 2005, Hamilton County commissioners ceded control of the center to the Health Alliance. The old board was dismantled, the administrative team fired, employee benefits slimmed down, and its budget and admissions policies overhauled.

The privatization not only stabilized the care center, it saved it. Now center administrator Karen Bankston, senior vice president at Drake for the Health Alliance, predicts a $9 million surplus by the end of the fiscal year. Equally important, the center has bumped up admissions and is hoping to open its doors to hundreds of Iraq war veterans with brain injuries and land a highly coveted Department of Defense contract for their care.

Alliance officials say the turnaround has been so successful that they’ll no longer need public funds after a Hamilton County operating levy expires next year.

The Drake story offers yet more evidence that private health care is superior to the public health care systems endorsed by certain major presidential candidates. May it serve as a candle, however dim, for an American public currently stumbling around in the dark when it comes to effective health care solutions.

A better idea for stimulus - part I

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

turnpikeThe latest “stimulus” plan from the Strickland Administration proposed taking ‘excess revenues’ (oh, what wonderful doublespeak!) from the Turnpike and spending on things like historical building renovation and corporate welfare enticements to Ohio businesses to hire more interns.

We’ve written about leasing the Turnpike (here and here) the $6 billion of dollars it could put into the Ohio economy stimulating growth though both direct expecture flows but also through the windfall of true infrastructure investments.

Instead of paying interest on bonds, the state would be collecting interest from a private Turnpike operator.

Now that’s a better idea!